A Clinical Comparison Of DIBS AI Digital Bonding Versus Traditional Direct Bonding
- media26149
- 24 hours ago
- 1 min read
Across 1,308 cases at 16 practices in 12 states, DIBS AI digital bonding reduced treatment time by 21% (about 5 months shorter), cut office visits by 24%, and required roughly 46% fewer wire bends and 40% fewer bracket repositions compared to traditional direct bonding — with more consistent, predictable outcomes across the board.