top of page

A Clinical Comparison Of DIBS AI Digital Bonding Versus Traditional Direct Bonding

  • media26149
  • 24 hours ago
  • 1 min read

Across 1,308 cases at 16 practices in 12 states, DIBS AI digital bonding reduced treatment time by 21% (about 5 months shorter), cut office visits by 24%, and required roughly 46% fewer wire bends and 40% fewer bracket repositions compared to traditional direct bonding — with more consistent, predictable outcomes across the board.

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page